In an March 16, 2009, op-ed for World Politics ReviewWhile the Iraq War may cast a shadow on democracy promotion in the Middle East, Research Director Shadi Hamid attempts to disentangle the prospects of future reform efforts from the greatest of foreign policy mistakes.
The Iraq War will surely stand as the greatest of foreign policy mistakes — a failure, and a tragic one, as no shortage of commentators have called it. What makes it more tragic is that it needn’t have been so. Whether or not one was firmly against the war from the start, the verdict on Iraq will ultimately be characterized by an unusual mix of anger, ambivalence, and, perhaps most of all, confusion.
From the beginning, Iraq wasn’t just about a war. It raised a series of questions that many of us still have trouble answering. If the war was morally wrong, was it because of its consequences, or despite them? Is what makes such wars immoral the fact that they are preemptive, or is it rather that preemption, from an empirical standpoint, fails more often than it succeeds? Is there something intrinsically wrong with using force in the service of what we claim are universal ideas and ideals?
Home / Publications / Commentary
Democracy Promotion in the Aftermath of Iraq
Shadi Hamid
Share
In an March 16, 2009, op-ed for World Politics ReviewWhile the Iraq War may cast a shadow on democracy promotion in the Middle East, Research Director Shadi Hamid attempts to disentangle the prospects of future reform efforts from the greatest of foreign policy mistakes.
The Iraq War will surely stand as the greatest of foreign policy mistakes — a failure, and a tragic one, as no shortage of commentators have called it. What makes it more tragic is that it needn’t have been so. Whether or not one was firmly against the war from the start, the verdict on Iraq will ultimately be characterized by an unusual mix of anger, ambivalence, and, perhaps most of all, confusion.
From the beginning, Iraq wasn’t just about a war. It raised a series of questions that many of us still have trouble answering. If the war was morally wrong, was it because of its consequences, or despite them? Is what makes such wars immoral the fact that they are preemptive, or is it rather that preemption, from an empirical standpoint, fails more often than it succeeds? Is there something intrinsically wrong with using force in the service of what we claim are universal ideas and ideals?
View full article here.>>
Related Work
|
Joint Statement – MENA States Must End Torture and Hold Perpetrators Accountable
|
Report – Back to Business as Usual: President Biden’s First Foreign Affairs Budget for the Middle East and North Africa
|
Joint Statement: Enforced Disappearances in MENA
MEDC’s newsletters bring you news, analysis, and insights about democracy and human rights in the Middle East and North Africa.