In a November 1, 2018 snapshot for Foreign Affairs, “Saudi Arabia’s Empty Oil Threats,” POMED’s Deputy Director for Policy Andrew Miller and co-author Sahar Nowrouzzadeh argue that Saudi threats to undermine U.S. Iran policy over the Khashoggi affair are not credible.
The brazen murder of Washington Post journalist and U.S. resident Jamal Khashoggi has elicited that rarest of reactions in contemporary U.S. politics: bipartisan consensus. Both Republicans and Democrats in the House and the Senate have condemned Saudi Arabia for the assassination operation in Istanbul, with the ever-colorful Lindsey Graham urging that the United States “sanction the hell out of” the Saudi government.
President Trump’s administration, however, has adopted a notably restrained response thus far: it is considering sanctioning the low-level operatives who carried out the killing but has given little indication that it will hold Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman personally responsible. One explanation for this reticence is that the administration fears that punitive steps could complicate its Iran policy. Senior administration officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, have alluded to such concerns when pressed on the Khashoggi case.
Administration officials reportedly worry that by applying too much pressure on the kingdom, they could inadvertently “jeopardize plans to enlist Saudi help to avoid disrupting the oil market.” The Trump administration has been counting on Saudi Arabia, as the world’s swing producer, to increase its oil production to help offset the anticipated loss of Iranian supply come November 5, when sanctions lifted under the Iran nuclear deal are re-imposed.
Home / Publications / Commentary
Saudi Arabia’s Empty Oil Threats – Foreign Affairs
Andrew Miller
Sahar Nowrouzzadeh
Share
In a November 1, 2018 snapshot for Foreign Affairs, “Saudi Arabia’s Empty Oil Threats,” POMED’s Deputy Director for Policy Andrew Miller and co-author Sahar Nowrouzzadeh argue that Saudi threats to undermine U.S. Iran policy over the Khashoggi affair are not credible.
The brazen murder of Washington Post journalist and U.S. resident Jamal Khashoggi has elicited that rarest of reactions in contemporary U.S. politics: bipartisan consensus. Both Republicans and Democrats in the House and the Senate have condemned Saudi Arabia for the assassination operation in Istanbul, with the ever-colorful Lindsey Graham urging that the United States “sanction the hell out of” the Saudi government.
President Trump’s administration, however, has adopted a notably restrained response thus far: it is considering sanctioning the low-level operatives who carried out the killing but has given little indication that it will hold Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman personally responsible. One explanation for this reticence is that the administration fears that punitive steps could complicate its Iran policy. Senior administration officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, have alluded to such concerns when pressed on the Khashoggi case.
Administration officials reportedly worry that by applying too much pressure on the kingdom, they could inadvertently “jeopardize plans to enlist Saudi help to avoid disrupting the oil market.” The Trump administration has been counting on Saudi Arabia, as the world’s swing producer, to increase its oil production to help offset the anticipated loss of Iranian supply come November 5, when sanctions lifted under the Iran nuclear deal are re-imposed.
Read the full article here.
Photo: Ron Przysucha/State Department
Related Work
|
Joint Statement: Saudi Arabia Must Free Detainees Ahead of Internet Governance Forum
|
When the United States Fails to Hold Saudi Arabia to Account, People Die
|
Crackdown on popular Saudi influencers and creators, with harsh sentence for hit producer
MEDC’s newsletters bring you news, analysis, and insights about democracy and human rights in the Middle East and North Africa.